Cases 31 - 40 of 89
NORINGTON v. ZOLEY et al
as 1:2019cv01185
Defendant:
KRUL, GEORGE C. ZOLEY, M. LOGAN and others
Plaintiff:
LAKESHA NORINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLONE v. GILBERT et al
as 1:2019cv00517
Defendant:
GILBERT and G.E.O OF NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff:
COULTER SLONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMS v. SPARKS et al
as 1:2019cv00011
Defendant:
TIMMONS, SAYLOR, KIDD and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARTER v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv02434
Defendant:
ALEISHA MORRIS, NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and GEO GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA LEVI HARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LATHAM v. NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2018cv01010
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS and NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Petitioner:
LARRY EUGENE LATHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JESSIE-BEY v. GEO et al
as 1:2018cv00238
Defendant:
GEO, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JOEL JESSIE-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANKH-EL v. NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2018cv00134
Plaintiff:
MENES ANKH-EL
Defendant:
NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JESSIE-BEY v. GEO et al
as 1:2018cv00132
Defendant:
GEO, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JOEL JESSIE-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARTER v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00583
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC., MS. MORRIS and NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA LEVI HARTER
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANKH-EL v. NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2017cv04665
Plaintiff:
MENES ANKH-EL
Defendant:
NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
