Cases 31 - 40 of 639
Spearman v. Director TDCJ/CID Nathaniel A. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00735
Petitioner:
Sedrick Dewayne Spearman
Respondent:
Director TDCJ/CID Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Quarterman
as 6:2009cv00185
Petitioner:
Judy M. Freeman
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Quarterman
as 6:2009cv00174
Petitioner:
David Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lising vs. Quarterman
as 6:2009cv00172
Plaintiff:
Leopoldo Galang Lising
Defendant:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman, Mary Shelly, Monika Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00583
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Juarez v. Quarterman
as 5:2009cv00587
Petitioner:
Gilbert Juarez
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franklin v. Quarterman
as 6:2009cv00171
Petitioner:
Brenda Joyce Franklin
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Quarterman
as 5:2009cv00564
Petitioner:
Pablo Rodriguez
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Minnfee v. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00127
Petitioner:
Barry Dwayne Minnfee
Respondent:
Nathaniel A Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Minnfee v. Quarterman
as 2:2009cv00176
Petitioner:
Barry Dwayne Minnfee
Respondent:
Nathaniel A Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
