Cases 31 - 40 of 208
Pearson v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv01521
Plaintiff:
Alex Pearson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cook County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv01054
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Pearson
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pearson et al v. Community Unit School District No. 303 et al
as 1:2020cv05096
Plaintiff:
Christin Pearson, Lisa Pearson and Christin P. Pearson
Defendant:
Antoinette Green, Terry Primdahl, Board of Education of Community Unit School District No. 303 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pearson et al v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2020cv02888
Plaintiff:
George Pearson, Amanda Hamerman, Steve Balich and others
Defendant:
Governor Jay Robert Pritzker and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Kinskey et al v. Cengage Learning, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02322
Defendant:
McGraw-Hill LLC, Cengage Learning, Inc., Follett Higher Education Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Grace Kinskey and Elizabeth Kinskey
Intervenor:
Martha Barabas, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Pearson v. Hawthorne et al
as 3:2020cv00309
Plaintiff:
Mark Pearson
Defendant:
James Murray, Alex Hawthorne and Gerard Spratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pearson v. Brown
as 2:2020cv02021
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Petitioner:
Douglas Pearson
Respondent:
Richard Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pearson v. Dwenger et al
as 1:2020cv00738
Plaintiff:
Douglas Pearson
Defendant:
Dwenger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gills v. The Bantry Group Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv03021
Defendant:
Britney Beard, Jill Parish, Doug Stephens and others
Plaintiff:
Jaryan Gills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Dwenger et al
as 1:2020cv01041
Plaintiff:
Douglas Pearson
Defendant:
. Dwenger, . Simms, BHS Fry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
