Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Allen et al v. Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Co et al
as 1:2011cv00499
Plaintiff:
Takqwanda Allen , All Plaintiffs , Tiffany Ashford and others
Defendant:
Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Co, Sentry Insurance, a Mutual Co., Burlington Insurance Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pettis v. USA
as 1:2011cv00472
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Derrick Pettis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00031
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Petty v. Byrd et al
as 1:2011cv00016
Plaintiff:
Michael Conrad Petty
Defendant:
Mike Byrd , Ken Broadus , Sonia Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00754
Plaintiff:
Jakie Petty
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and John Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Hinds County et al
as 3:2010cv00350
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bocardia Scott
Defendant:
Hinds County, James Ingram and Tanaka Pettis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ross v. Scott et al
as 3:2010cv00296
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Rashad Ross
Defendant:
Eric Scott and Unknown Pettis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Hinds County Detention Facility et al
as 3:2010cv00168
Plaintiff:
Johnny L. Smith
Defendant:
Hinds County Detention Facility, Unknown Harris and Unknown Petty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon et al v. Keystone Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00822
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Dixon, Sr., Patricia A. Dixon, Shelia S. Dufrene and others
Defendant:
Keystone Industries, Inc., Keystone RV Company, CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
