Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Danaher Corporation & Subsidiaries Pension Plan et al v. Porter
as 3:2011cv00161
Plaintiff:
Danaher Corporation & Subsidiaries Pension Plan and Northern Trust Co
Defendant:
Patricia R. Porter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01774
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
United States of America v. $9,200 in United States Currency et al
as 3:2010cv00821
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$9,200 in United States Currency, $2,170 in United States Currency, $160 in United States Currency and others
Claimant:
Forrest Hempstead and Charquita Porter
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Witherspoon v. Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00640
Plaintiff:
Altarak G. Witherspoon
Defendant:
Dept of Corrections, Claudio, R. Ortyl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick et al v. Porter-Cable Corp et al
as 3:2010cv00131
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Patrick and Jean Patrick
Defendant:
Porter-Cable Corp and Home Depot USA Inc
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Porter v. JC Penney Corp Inc
as 3:2009cv00364
Plaintiff:
Howard Porter and Howard Porter
Defendant:
JC Penney Corp Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Bass v. Miss Porter's School et al
as 3:2008cv01807
Plaintiff:
Tatum T. Bass and Tatum T. Bass
Defendant:
Miss Porter's School, Miss Porter's School, Miss Porter's School and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Porter v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2008cv00067
Petitioner:
Kenneth B. Porter
Respondent:
State of Connecticut, John Sieminski, Jodi Rell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
New Stream Real Est, LLC v. Porter et al
as 3:2007cv01463
Plaintiff:
New Stream Real Est, LLC
Defendant:
Anthony Porter, Stephan Rayborn, Harold Lee Farthing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
