Cases 31 - 40 of 137
Adeniji v. Attorney General Middle District of Florida et al
as 3:2018cv00392
Plaintiff:
Dianne Roberta Adeniji
Defendant:
Attorney General Middle District of Florida, Attorney General Pam Bondi and Civil Rights Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clements v. Scott et al
as 2:2018cv00178
Plaintiff:
Louis Matthew Clements
Defendant:
Rick Scott, Pam Bondi and Stephen B. Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McGuire v. Jones et al
as 1:2017cv09564
Petitioner:
Tommy R. McGuire
Respondent:
Julie Jones and Pam Bondi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dowd v. Bondi et al
as 9:2017cv81319
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Dowd
Defendant:
Pam Bondi and Carey Haughwout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myrick v. Bondi et al
as 8:2017cv02890
Petitioner:
Craig Allen Myrick
Respondent:
Pam Bondi and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGuire v. Jones et al
as 3:2017cv02260
Petitioner:
Tommy R. McGuire
Respondent:
Julie Jones and Pam Bondi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Brooks et al
as 8:2017cv01384
Plaintiff:
Leland R. Johnson
Defendant:
Kevin Brooks, Polk County, Sheriff Department, Pam Bondi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zanger v. Jones et al
as 0:2017cv60962
Defendant:
Julie Jones and Pam Bondi
Plaintiff:
Scott Zanger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LAVERGNE et al v. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES et al
as 1:2017cv00793
Plaintiff:
EUGENE MARTIN LAVERGNE, FREDERICK JOHN LAVERGNE, LEONARD P. MARSHALL and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PAUL RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Knight v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2017cv00968
Petitioner:
Christopher Knight
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Pam Bondi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
