Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Basey v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al
as 1:2012cv01897
Plaintiff:
Paris Basey
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, MERS, Inc. , Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Davis v. Floyd County Sheriff's Dept et al
as 4:2012cv00070
Plaintiff:
Reginald L. Davis
Defendant:
Christopher Parton, Ghee Wilson, Randy Pyles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crook et al v. Fuzi, D.C. et al
as 2:2012cv00066
Plaintiff:
Russell Paris Crook and Barbara Lee Epperly Crook
Defendant:
Brandon Scott Fuzi, D.C. and Family Life Chiropractic Center, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al v. Paris et al
as 4:2012cv00008
Plaintiff:
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
Ted Paris , Ted Construction Company, Inc. and Ben Paris
Counter_claimant:
Ted Paris , Ted Construction Company, Inc. and Ben Paris
Counter_defendant:
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Paris v. Green et al
as 1:2011cv02455
Plaintiff:
Steve J. Paris
Defendant:
Thomas Green and Sidney A. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huttenbach v. Donald et al
as 1:2011cv01586
Plaintiff:
Robert Louis Huttenbach
Defendant:
James E. Donald, Joseph Paris and Georgia Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Huttenbach v. Donald et al
as 1:2011cv01389
Plaintiff:
Robert Louis Huttenbach
Defendant:
James E. Donald and Joseph Paris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
