Cases 31 - 40 of 426
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv04439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2023cv00749
Plaintiff:
Thomas Workman and Unknown Persons
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Rufina (Perla) Sanchez, Jasmine Martinez and others
Respondent:
Unknown Pesons
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Lopez et al v. Interni Cucine America LLC et al
as 6:2023cv01409
Plaintiff:
Marlon Lopez, Chris S. Valdivia Benavidez, Perla Miranda and others
Defendant:
Interni Cucine America LLC and Marco Maset
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lesende et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
as 1:2023cv07041
Plaintiff:
Enrique Lesende, Perla Lesende and N. L.
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Wang v. Necessity Retail REIT, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06456
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Necessity Retail REIT, Inc., Edward M. Weil, Jr., Lisa Kabnick and others
Trejo
as 1:2023at00652
Plaintiff:
Perla Trejo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
O'Dell v. Necessary Retail REIT, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06302
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Necessary Retail REIT, Inc., Michael Weil, Lisa Kabnick and others
Perla Herrera v. City of Chicago, et al
as 23-2205
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PERLA HERRERA
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, a municipal corporation and HECTOR M. FUENTES, Chicago Police Officer, Star No. 11396
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
