Cases 31 - 40 of 165
Amburgey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00072
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jeannie Lynn Peters Amburgey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Peters v. USA
as 1:2020cv00358
Petitioner:
Rhett Peters
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Conklin v. Sims
as 2:2020cv00104
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Charlie Sims
Plaintiff:
Justin Peter Conklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Conklin v. Forrest County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2020cv00071
Defendant:
Forrest County Circuit Court, Charlie Sims, Matthew Shoemaker and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Justin Peter Conklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Arrington
as 1:2020cv00134
Defendant:
Joseph Arrington
Plaintiff:
Peter Henderson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Conklin v. Estes et al
as 2:2020cv00051
Defendant:
Chip Estes and Lamar County Sheriff's Department
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Justin Peter Conklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morency v. Paul
as 5:2020cv00035
Petitioner:
Peter Morency
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Respondent:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Russell v. Wisniewski, M.D. et al
as 1:2020cv00021
Defendant:
Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Watson Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mandie Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aldridge et al v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00868
Plaintiff:
James Cole, Daphne Tyler, Laverne Boone and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Jacqueline Thompson, Pelicia Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Arcuri v. Dana Transport, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00419
Plaintiff:
Peter Arcuri
Defendant:
Dana Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
