Cases 31 - 40 of 725
Brown v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Peter David Brown
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Downs v. Peters
as 3:2023cv00259
Petitioner:
Elizabeth Diane Downs
Respondent:
Collette S. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Fhuere
as 3:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Smith
Defendant:
Corey Fhuere, Katy Coba, A. Kidwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lobue v. Steward et al
as 6:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Zachary Michael Lobue
Defendant:
Heidi Steward, Colette Peters, Brian Belleque and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foust v. Faust et al
as 2:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jessica Anne Marie Foust
Defendant:
Faust, C/O OSCI Freeman, C/O OSCI Highberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tilahun v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Shua Tilahun
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Sgt. Bernhardt, Cory Furey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Peters
as 6:2022cv01953
Plaintiff:
Tariq Muhammad
Defendant:
Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coppler v. Washburn et al
as 2:2022cv01913
Plaintiff:
Steven Coppler
Defendant:
superintendent Sue Washburn, Collette Peters, Nurse Blood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gines v. Brown et al
as 6:2022cv01880
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lynn Gines
Defendant:
Kate Brown, Heidi Steward, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
