Cases 31 - 40 of 46
United States of America v. Eloisa Valle et al
as 2:2012cv05572
Defendant:
County of Los San Bernardino Treasurer-Tax Collector, Ruben R Ramirez and Eloisa Valle
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Ramirez v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv05917
Plaintiff:
Javier R. Ramirez
Defendant:
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. and Sport and Fitness Clubs of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ramirez v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv05917
Plaintiff:
Javier R. Ramirez
Defendant:
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. and Sport and Fitness Clubs of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02709
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011at01473
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Koklich v. California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation et al
as 1:2011at00503
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation , James A. Yates , P. Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Koklich v. California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation et al
as 1:2011cv01403
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation , James A. Yates , P. Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dustin Lunde v. Riverside County Sheriffs Department et al
as 5:2011cv00577
Defendant:
W Delreal, Does, J Dunlap and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lunde
Paul A. Fassoth v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2010cv07880
Defendant:
Janell Bader, City of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Fassoth
Ramirez v. Grounds
as 3:2010cv00860
Petitioner:
Eliaser R. Ramirez
Respondent:
Randy Grounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
