Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Ramos v. Astrue
as 4:2013cv00088
Plaintiff:
Karen Louise Ramos
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benenfits
Luevano v. Western Shamrock Corporation
as 4:2012cv01135
Plaintiff:
Lupe Ramos Luevano
Defendant:
Western Shamrock Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Emerson Electric Co. v. Yeo
as 4:2012cv01578
Plaintiff:
Emerson Electric Co.
Defendant:
Peter Ramos Yeo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramos et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00074
Plaintiff:
Gabriela Ramos and Oscar Ramos
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Covidien Inc., Covidien LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Littlefield et al v. Dealer Warranty Services, LLC
as 4:2009cv01000
Defendant:
Dealer Warranty Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Daniel J Littlefield, Michael P Ramo, Andrea M Rayburn and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Henderson v. Jordan et al
as 4:2009cv00937
Plaintiff:
F. Charlene Henderson
Defendant:
John R. Jordan, Jr., Bobby L. Martin, Aubrey B. Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
RAMOS et al v. ORGANON USA, INC. et al
as 4:2008cv01743
Plaintiff:
LISABETH A. RAMOS and PAUL RAMOS
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc., Organon Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Organon International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Gamboa-Ramos v. United States of America
as 4:2008cv00031
Petitioner:
Eloy Gamboa-Ramos
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Balcinovic v. Astrue
as 4:2007cv01330
Plaintiff:
Ramo Balcinovic
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Johnson et al v. Kelly
as 2:2007cv00016
Plaintiff:
Waylen Johnson, James Redlinger, Pete Galluzzio and others
Defendant:
Michael E. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
