Cases 31 - 40 of 87
Rivera v. Johnson et al
as 9:2017cv00566
Plaintiff:
Raul Rivera
Defendant:
Vonda Johnson, C. Simpson, Dragos Macelaru and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West Palm Beach Police Pension Fund et al v. Zyskind et al
as 1:2017cv00553
Plaintiff:
West Palm Beach Police Pension Fund
Defendant:
AmTrust Financial Services, Inc., Barry D. Zyskind, George Karfunkel and others
Intervenor:
Pompano Beach Police & Firefighters' Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Chavez v. United States of America
as 7:2017cv00081
Plaintiff:
Raul Rivera Chavez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ding v. Zyskind et al
as 1:2017cv00433
Plaintiff:
Lily Ding
Defendant:
Barry D. Zyskind, Ronald E. Pipoly, Jr., Donald T. Decarlo and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Rivera et al
as 2:2017cv00125
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Raul Rivera and Maria L. Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rivera v. Johnson et al
as 6:2017cv06171
Plaintiff:
Raul Rivera
Defendant:
Vonda Johnson, C. Simpson, Dragos Macelaru and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raul Rivera Chavez v. Santa Clara Superior Court et al
as 3:2017cv00571
Plaintiff:
Raul Rivera Chavez
Defendant:
Santa Clara Superior Court, Santa Clara County Jail, San Jose Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raul Rivera Chavez v. Santa Clara Superior Court et al
as 2:2016cv09613
Plaintiff:
Raul Rivera Chavez
Defendant:
Emergency Personal, Sgt. Kesloe, San Jose Police Department and others
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Rivera et al
as 2:2016cv00517
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Raul Rivera and Maria L. Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Raul Rivera Chavez v. Junell et al
as 2:2016cv07299
Petitioner:
Raul Rivera Chavez
Respondent:
Richard B. Ives and United States Judge Junell
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
