Cases 31 - 40 of 145
Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv25235
Plaintiff:
Raul Rodriguez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205
Raul Rodriguez v. CDCR-Agents, et al
as 20-55707
Defendant / Appellee:
S. K. HEMENWAY, Appeals Examiner, individual capacity, E. MOSSER, individual; Appeals Coordinator CCII. official capacity, CDCR-AGENTS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL RODRIGUEZ
(HC) Rodriguez v. Hill
as 2:2020cv01268
Respondent:
Rick Hill
Petitioner:
Raul Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv92157
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RAUL RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv92149
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN RAUL RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raul Rodriguez v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAC/2:20-CV-03398
Plaintiff:
Raul Rodriguez
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Rodriguez v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAS/3:20-CV-00380
Plaintiff:
Rodriguez and Raul Rodriguez
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and DOES 1 through 20
Rodriguez v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2020cv00380
Plaintiff:
Raul Rodriguez
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and DOES 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Ahmed v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2020cv00394
Defendant:
Lisjuan and Martinez Transport, LLC, Fernando Jose and Raul Rodriguez
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Ahmed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Cruz v. 3F Technologies, LLC d/b/a Progressive Technologies, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv04386
Plaintiff:
David Cruz
Defendant:
3F Technologies, LLC d/b/a Progressive Technologies, LLC, Roman Coronado, Raul Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
