Cases 31 - 40 of 82
Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. v. Rowland
as 4:2017cv00983
Plaintiff:
Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.
Defendant:
James W Rowland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Finch v. Doyle et al
as 1:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
Drake Finch
Defendant:
FNU Doyle, FNU Rowland, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casey Ross v. Oilfield Instrumentation, USA, Inc.
as 5:2017cv00312
Plaintiff:
Fabian Arnaud, Randy Barfield, Kendrick Brown and others
Defendant:
Oilfield Instrumentation, USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Bazile v. Moore et al
as 4:2017cv01035
Plaintiff:
Cherrie M Bazile
Defendant:
Roy L. Moore, James Cooper, Eraka Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2005
County of Bexar, et al v. Martin
as 5:2017cv00219
Plaintiff:
City of San Antonio, County of Bexar, San Antonio Independent School District and others
Defendant:
Opal Gilliam and Rowland J. Martin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Rowland v. USA
as 4:2016cv00720
Petitioner:
Mary Katholeen Rowland
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rowland v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2016cv00229
Petitioner:
Jesse Garrett Rowland
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Tx
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Fountain et al v. Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
as 4:2016cv01556
Plaintiff:
Doris Fountain , LaWanda Rowland , Cheryl Armstrong and others
Defendant:
Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Rowland v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2016cv00535
Plaintiff:
Vikki Rowland
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy International Limited , Johnson & Johnson and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Searcy v. T.F.R. Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00381
Defendant:
Tipton Rowland and T.F.R. Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jesse Searcy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
