Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Reeves et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 3:2013cv00675
Plaintiff:
Charles Reeves , Ruby Reeves , William B. Reeves and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Becerra v. Dart et al
as 1:2013cv04879
Plaintiff:
Cesar Becerra
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Cook County, Salvador Gordinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Rutledge v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv00870
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rutledge
Defendant:
City of Chicago Department of Buildings and Rahm Emanuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rutledge v. Cross
as 3:2012cv01042
Petitioner:
Tom L Rutledge, Sr
Respondent:
James N Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jiminez et al v. Gresk et al
as 1:2012cv01870
Plaintiff:
Margarita Jiminez and Robert Sandberg
Defendant:
Michael J Gresk , Tom Mouhelis , John K Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutledge v. US Secret Service
as 1:2011cv08392
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rutledge
Defendant:
US Secret Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Rutledge v. City of Chicago Water Department et al
as 1:2010cv04930
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rutledge
Defendant:
City of Chicago Water Department and Thomas Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rutledge v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv05976
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rutledge
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rutledge v. Daley et al
as 1:2008cv07270
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Chicago Police, Department of Sanitation and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rutledge
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rutledge et al v. Bucky's Express LLC et al
as 3:2007cv50023
Plaintiff:
Terry J Rutledge and Betty M Rutledge
Defendant:
Bucky's Express LLC, Bucky's Express LLC, Bucky's Express LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
