Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Rentas v. Blain et al
as 1:2010cv03907
Plaintiff:
Axel Rentas
Defendant:
Blain, A.W. Smith, Including M.D.'s, P.A. and D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rentas v. Blain et al
as 1:2010cv03906
Plaintiff:
Axel Rentas
Defendant:
Blain, A.W. Smith, Including M.D.'s, P.A. and D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rentas v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv08043
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Rentas
Defendant:
The City of New York, Michael Smith, Michael Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rentas v. Nason
as 1:2009cv05528
Plaintiff:
Axel Rentas
Defendant:
Lisa Nason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rentas et al v. American Airlines, Inc.
as 1:2009cv01257
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rentas and Gilberto Rentas
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rentas v. Perez et al
as 1:2009cv00071
Plaintiff:
Axel Rentas
Defendant:
Perez and Talford Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oscar de la Renta, Ltd. v. Elizabeth Arden, Inc.
as 1:2008cv05785
Plaintiff:
Oscar DE LA Renta, Ltd., Oscar DE LA Renta, Ltd., Oscar DE LA Renta, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Elizabeth Arden, Inc., Elizabeth Arden, Inc. and Elizabeth Arden, Inc.
Intervenor Defendant:
YSL Beaute, Inc. and YSL Beaute, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Rentas v. Perez et al
as 1:2008cv05838
Plaintiff:
Alex Rentas
Defendant:
Perez, Spanic, Ruffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Axel v. Deputy Warden et al
as 1:2008cv04980
Plaintiff:
Rentas Axel
Defendant:
Deputy Warden, Perez, Ruffin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Oscar De La Renta, Ltd.. v. Mulberry Thai Silks, Inc.
as 1:2008cv04341
Plaintiff:
Oscar De La Renta, Ltd.., Oscar De La Renta, Ltd.. and Oscar De La Renta, Ltd..
Defendant:
Mulberry Thai Silks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
