Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Halvorson et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv09711
Plaintiff:
Bernice M. Halvorson and Richard W. Halvorson
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv09488
Plaintiff:
Sandra Miller and Richard W. Miller, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ault v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00036
Plaintiff:
Stoney William Ault
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., James C. Boddey, Henry Presser, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lamp v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2007cv00130
Plaintiff:
Richard W Lamp
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Smith v. The United States et al
as 5:2007cv00113
Petitioner:
James Preston Smith
Defendant:
The United States, William Turner, Robert Irons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hardy Storage Company, LLC v. Property Interests Necessary to Conduct Gas Storage Operations in the Oriskany Sandstone Subterranean Geological Formation Beneath Properties Located in Hardy and Hampshire Counties Owned By et al
as 2:2007cv00005
Plaintiff:
Hardy Storage Company, LLC, Hardy Storage Company, LLC and Hardy Storage Company, LLC
Defendant:
Property Interests Necessary to Conduct Gas Storage Operations in the Oriskany Sandstone Subterranean Geological Formation Beneath Properties Located in Hardy and Hampshire Counties Owned By, Mark E. Landis, Julie C. Landis and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
