Cases 31 - 40 of 178
RICHMOND et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65584
Plaintiff:
HAROLD P RICHMOND and DONNA SUE RICHMOND
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSCOE et al v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63613
Plaintiff:
RICHMOND ROSCOE and DELMA TAYLOR ROSCOE
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION, OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RICHMOND v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2010cv57743
Plaintiff:
DAVID F. RICHMOND, JR.
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
RICHMOND v. CALIFORNIA TANKER INC.
as 2:2010cv57545
Plaintiff:
DAVID F. RICHMOND, JR.
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA TANKER INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688 Jones Act
RICHMOND v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv54922
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE A. RICHMOND
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
COLLINS et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2010cv50621
Plaintiff:
RICHMOND C COLLINS and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
COLLINS et al v. ALCOA STEAMSHIP COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2010cv50620
Plaintiff:
RICHMOND C COLLINS and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
ALCOA STEAMSHIP COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BACCHUS v. RICHMOND
as 1:2010cv00148
Plaintiff:
BRENTNOL F. BACCHUS
Defendant:
MARY A. RICHMOND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SPEARS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv38653
Plaintiff:
RICHMOND C. SPEARS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BACCHUS v. RICHMOND
as 1:2010cv00141
Plaintiff:
BRENTNOL F. BACCHUS
Defendant:
MARY A. RICHMOND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
