Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
BURRIS et al v. MILLVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2012cv04678
Plaintiff:
DELITA SHERMANE BURRIS
Defendant:
MILLVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT , CITY OF MILLVILLE , JOHN BUTSCHKY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
SMITH et al v. KRAUSE et al
as 3:2012cv03588
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY SMITH and ROBERT SMITH
Defendant:
PAUL KRAUSE and WENDY KRAUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
SMITH v. SCHULTZ
as 3:2010cv03637
Petitioner:
ROBERT SMITH
Respondent:
PAUL SCHULTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
MARRAKUSH SOCIETY v. TOWNSHIP OF WILLINGBORO et al
as 1:2009cv03503
Plaintiff:
MARRAKUSH SOCIETY
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WILLINGBORO, WILLINGBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANTHONY WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARRAKUSH SOCIETY v. TOWNSHIP OF WILLINGBORO et al
as 1:2009cv02522
Plaintiff:
MARRAKUSH SOCIETY
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WILLINGBORO, WILLINGBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT, DICELER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GUASTAFERRO et al v. OCEAN COURTS et al
as 3:2008cv06022
Plaintiff:
JAMES GUASTAFERRO and MARY GRISWOLD
Defendant:
OCEAN COURTS, BERKLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ROBERT SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
