Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Rotor Concept Inc v. Xheli Inc et al
as 2:2011cv07547
Defendant:
Does, John Ma, Xheli Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Rotor Concept Inc
Macomb Interceptor Drain Drainage District v. Kilpatrick et al
as 2:2011cv13101
Plaintiff:
Macomb Interceptor Drain Drainage District
Defendant:
Kwame Kilpatrick, Victor Mercado, Derrick A. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
RSR Corporation et al v. Aaron Ferer & Sons, Co. et al
as 2:2009cv01891
Plaintiff:
RSR Corporation, Quemetco, Inc., Davis Wire Corporation and others
Defendant:
Aaron Ferer & Sons, Co., Active Recycling Co., Inc., Alpert & Alpert Iron & Metal, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chicago Graphic Arts Health and Welfare Plan et al v. Unitech Prepress Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv06287
Plaintiff:
Chicago Graphic Arts Health and Welfare Plan, Chicago Graphic Arts Health and Welfare Plan, Chicago Graphic Arts Health and Welfare Plan and others
Defendant:
Unitech Prepress Solutions, Inc. and Robert E. Ludford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Miletti-Martinez et al v. Rotor Hawk Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv01184
Plaintiff:
Jose Miletti-Martinez, Jose Alberto Miletti-Martinez, Carlos Miletti-Martinez and others
Defendant:
Rotor Hawk Industries, Inc., John Doe and Insurance Companies A,B
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Allensworth v. Canadian Home Rotors et al
as 3:2007cv03051
Plaintiff:
Barbara Allensworth and Barbara Allensworth
Defendant:
Canadian Home Rotors and John Doe Machine Shop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COMPOSITE ROTOR V BECKMAN COULTER
as 02-1535
Defendant-Appellee:
BECKMAN COULTER, INC.
Plaintiff-Appellant:
COMPOSITE ROTOR, INC.
COMPOSITE ROTOR V BECKMAN COULTER
as 01-1447
Defendant-Appellant:
BECKMAN COULTER, INC.
Plaintiff-Appellee:
COMPOSITE ROTOR, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
