Cases 31 - 40 of 258
Schroeder v. DHHS Executive Director et al
as 4:2022cv00637
Plaintiff:
Christopher Schroeder
Defendant:
DHHS Executive Director, Dr. Kelly R. Goodness, Flint David Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Correct Care Solutions
as 6:2022cv00781
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Shelton
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Correct Care Solutions
as 5:2022cv00708
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Shelton
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Omega Capital Funding Inc.
as 3:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
James Everett Shelton
Defendant:
Omega Capital Funding Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Shelton v. Corporal Burr et al
as 4:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
Johne Christopher Shelton
Defendant:
Corporal Burr, Security Officer Minyard, Security Officer King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stantorf III v. Shelton et al
as 1:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
Robert Stantorf III
Defendant:
Jamie Shelton, Henna Chevrolet, LP, Mac Haik Ford, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Williams v. Lt. Shelton
as 4:2022cv00845
Plaintiff:
Lamark Anthony Williams Jr.
Defendant:
Lt. Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. The State Of Texas et al
as 2:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Shelton
Defendant:
The State Of Texas and Judge McCoy
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Shelton v. Citibank, NA
as 3:2022cv00730
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M Shelton
Defendant:
Citibank, NA
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
