Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,100
Nigel Dalbert v. Coastal SP Warden
as 24-10673
Petitioner: NIGEL LAWRENCE DALBERT
Respondent: COASTAL SP WARDEN
Georgette Thornton v. Smokes, et al
as 24-10559
Plaintiff: GEORGETTE BENITA THORNTON
Defendant: SMOKES, PULASKI SP WARDEN, COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Ducky Ltd. v. Iviliia Millionic IT Sp. z o.o.
as 3:2024cv02268
Plaintiff: Ducky Ltd.
Defendant: Iviliia Millionic IT Sp. z o.o.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02557
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Waseem Daker v. Hays SP Warden
as 24-10328
Petitioner: WASEEM DAKER
Respondent: HAYS SP WARDEN
SP, LLC v. The Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A.
as 1:2024cv21133
Plaintiff: SP, LLC
Defendant: The Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. SP 74 AW California Owner, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00593
Plaintiff: United African-Asian Abilities Club and James Lee
Defendant: SP 74 AW California Owner, LLC and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
MIXRTVAGD.PL SP Z.O.O. v. SHALLAL INTERNATIONAL, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv10494
Plaintiff: MIXRTVAGD.PL SP Z.O.O. and Mixrtvagd.PL. SP. Z.O.O.
Defendant: SHALLAL INTERNATIONAL, LLC and Pavlo Shallal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Walker v. SP Cruises OPCO
as 1:2024cv20173
Plaintiff: Wendy Walker
Defendant: SP Cruises OPCO Limited doing business as Azamara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
SP Plus Corporation v. Steven Ramos et al
as 2:2024cv00446
Plaintiff: SP PLUS CORPORATION
Defendant: Steven Ramos and VPNE PARKING SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?