Cases 31 - 40 of 182
Tyson v. Business Office et al
as 4:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant:
Business Office and C.N.A. Enterainment LLC
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyson v. Congressional District of Washington D.C.
as 4:2021cv00325
Plaintiff:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant:
Congressional District of Washington D.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyson v. Iowa Prison Industries Canteen
as 4:2021cv00333
Plaintiff:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant:
Iowa Prison Industries Canteen and Iowa Prison Industries
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyson v. Bieden Administration et al
as 4:2021cv00288
Plaintiff:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant:
Bieden Administration and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deering v. United States of America
as 6:2021cv02054
Petitioner:
Amos Dee Deering, Sr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Perkins v. State of Iowa
as 4:2021cv00270
Petitioner:
Terrace Tyrone Perkins, Sr.
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tyson v. Dietsch
as 1:2021cv00061
Plaintiff:
James Charles Tyson, Sr
Defendant:
Tracy Dietsch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Iowa Department of Corrections
as 4:2021cv00199
Petitioner:
Antavicon C. Jackson, Sr.
Respondent:
Iowa Department of Corrections
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tyson v. Anamosa State Penitentary Classification Committee et al
as 1:2021cv00060
Plaintiff:
James Charles Tyson, Sr
Defendant:
Warden of Treatment and Anamosa State Penitentary Classification Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyson v. Larson et al
as 1:2021cv00049
Plaintiff:
James Charles Tyson, Sr
Defendant:
Jeremy Larson, Jeffery Thompson, Thomas Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
