Cases 31 - 40 of 2,052
Washington v. Carr et al
as 1:2024cv01025
Plaintiff:
Raymond Washington
Defendant:
Chris Carr, Kathryn Powers, Scott Kreher and others
Johns et al v. Halpin et al
as 4:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Johns and Bliss Laura Johns
Defendant:
Ryan Benjamin Halpin and Scott Chitwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCOTT v. MCFARLANE
as 7:2024cv00019
Petitioner:
DARRELL BERNARD SCOTT, JR
Respondent:
ANDREW MCFARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE) and ANDREW MCFARLANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. McFarland
as 3:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
Darrell Bernard Scott, Jr
Respondent:
Andrew McFarland
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marselis v. Fox Factory Holding Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Ryan Marselis
Defendant:
Fox Factory Holding Corp., Michael C. Dennison, Dennis C. Schemm and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Middlebrooks v. Kasmar et al
as 4:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Lillie M. Middlebrooks
Defendant:
Sergeant Scott Kasmar, Major Chris DeHart, Private First Class Chris Ridling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Wiza et al
as 1:2024cv00575
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Scott Wiza and Rutledge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Davis v. Richmond Honan Development and Acquisitions, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Randy Davis
Defendant:
Richmond Honan Development and Acquisitions, LLC and Scott Honan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
