Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Williams v. Raynor Rensch & Pfieffer et al
as 8:2011cv00446
Defendant:
Bellevue Police Department, John Brazda, Dave Bruck and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. $1,000.00 refunded to Mango Creek Properties, Inc. from GBS Partners,Inc. seized on January 28, 2010 et al
as 8:2011cv00372
Defendant:
$1,000.00 refunded to Mango Creek Properties, Inc. from GBS Partners,Inc. seized on January 28, 2010, $1,000.00 seized on December 22, 2009 from Spence Escrow Company from an escrow account holding money for Deshawn Hernandez, $1,445.00 in United States currency delivered to Terry Haddock by Deshawn Hernandez on May 27, 2009 and on July 6, 2009 and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Shannon Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Williams v. Newton et al
as 8:2009cv00282
Plaintiff:
Shannon Williams
Defendant:
Jeffrey Newton, Mark Foxhall, black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Holder et al
as 8:2009cv00262
Petitioner:
Shannon Williams
Respondent:
Eric Holder and Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv00238
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Shannon v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2009cv03034
Plaintiff:
Melanie C Shannon
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Shannon v. Houston
as 8:2008cv00524
Petitioner:
Gene Shannon
Respondent:
Robert P. Houston
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Capitol Records et al v. Rhoades
as 8:2007cv00106
Plaintiff:
Capitol Records, Interscope Records, UMG Recordings and others
Defendant:
Shannon Rhoades
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
