Cases 31 - 40 of 82
Shaw v. Arizona, State of et al
as 3:2018cv08312
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Kim Anue, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Durell K Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith #197527 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv02657
Defendant:
Unknown Moore, Unknown Rowe, Unknown Kimble and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Vaughn Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuqua #215717 v. Raak et al
as 2:2018cv02337
Defendant:
Unknown Horn, Unknown Troman, Unknown Gonzelez and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Fuqua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01782
Plaintiff:
Margie W Shaw
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaw v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01593
Plaintiff:
Rick Shaw
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allah v. Ash et al
as 4:2018cv00259
Plaintiff:
Rateek Allah
Defendant:
Unknown Ash, Unknown Stokes, Unknown Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fuqua #215717 v. Raak et al
as 2:2018cv01379
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Fuqua
Defendant:
Unknown Raak, D Webster, Unknown Higuera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv00133
Plaintiff:
R D Moore
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, D Karas, Unknown Vail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson #181293 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv03763
Petitioner:
Eric Shaw Gibson
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv03773
Petitioner:
Eric Shaw Gibson
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
