Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00856
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Joan Roe v. St. Louis University, et al
as 13-1206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joan Roe
Plaintiff:
Mary Roe and John Roe
Defendant - Appellee:
St. Louis University, Sigma Tau Gamma Fraternity, Inc., by and through its agent of record William Bernier and Sigma Tau Gamma Epsilon Xi Chapter
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Casey v. Wittenauer et al
as 3:2011cv00786
Plaintiff:
Mary Casey
Defendant:
Julie Wittenauer, M.D. , Ashley Malcolm, M. D. , David Dorsey, M. D. and others
Respondent:
Marjorie Guthrie, M. D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2818
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Saint Louis University v. Duncan et al
as 4:2011cv01367
Plaintiff:
St. Louis University
Defendant:
Arne Duncan and The United States Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Scott v. United States of America et al
as 4:2010cv00248
Plaintiff:
Vincent Scott
Defendant:
United States of America, St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department, St. Louis Fire Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jeannine Arpin v. Saint Louis University
as 10-1094
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JEANNINE ARPIN, as Administrator of the Estate of RONALD ARPIN, Deceased
Defendant - Appellant:
ST. LOUIS UNIVERSITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
