Cases 31 - 40 of 49
SAINT ROSE HOSPITAL et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2013cv01004
Plaintiff:
SAINT ROSE HOSPITAL , MERCY MEDICAL CENTER MERCED , CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Stamford Hospitality, LP v. NLRB
as 13-1188
Petitioner:
Stamford Hospitality, LP
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Stamford Hospitality, LP v. NLRB
as 13-1085
Petitioner:
Stamford Hospitality, LP, doing business as Stamford Plaza Hotel and Conference Center
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Hooja v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 3:2013cv00261
Plaintiff:
Rajat Hooja
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Connecticut State's Attorney, Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svcs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MERCY MEDICAL CENTER MERCED et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2012cv01502
Plaintiff:
MERCY MEDICAL CENTER MERCED , CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER , WATERBURY HOSPITAL HEALTH CENTER and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00790
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00546
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sloane v. Stamford Hospital
as 3:2011cv01921
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Sloane
Defendant:
Stamford Hospital
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stein v. Viscarello, MD et al
as 7:2011cv08304
Plaintiff:
Miriam Stein
Defendant:
Richard Viscarello, MD, Gerald Rakos, MD , Stamford Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3969
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
