Cases 31 - 40 of 20,735
Mata v. State of Arizona
as 3:2024cv50183
Defendant:
State of Arizona and City of Chandler
Plaintiff:
Christian Mata
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Eggleston et al v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03974
Plaintiff:
Jason Eggleston and Kim Henderson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv50181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Harris
as 1:2024cv03955
Plaintiff:
CENTRAL STATES SOUTHEAST ) AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND and Charles A. Whobrey
Defendant:
Nezsba Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
State of Illinois v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv03965
Plaintiff:
People of the State of Illinois
Defendant:
Keyona Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
State of Illinois v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv03979
Plaintiff:
State of Illinois
Defendant:
Keyona M Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Moore v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2024cv03119
Plaintiff:
John Moore
Defendant:
State of Illinois and Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Negron v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03939
Plaintiff:
Willie Negron
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
