Cases 31 - 40 of 149
Jason Kron v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 13-30272
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON J. KRON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES M. LEBLANC, Secretary, STEVE RADER, Regional Warden, ROBERT C. TANNER, Warden and others
Raymond Matos v. Steve Rader
as 13-30251
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYMOND MATOS
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE RADER
Stewart v. Rader et al
as 2:2013cv00443
Plaintiff:
Aaron Stewart
Defendant:
Steve Rader
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Rader et al
as 2:2013cv00452
Plaintiff:
Taft Wilson
Defendant:
Steve Rader
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley v. Rader et al
as 3:2013cv00147
Petitioner:
Terry J. Bradley
Respondent:
James D. Caldwell, Jr. and Steve Rader
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sylve v. Rader et al
as 2:2013cv00325
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Sylve, III
Defendant:
Steve Rader
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clayton Lewis v. Dixon Correction Institute
as 13-30167
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLAYTON LEWIS
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE RADER, Warden, Dixon Correction Institute
Abbott v. Tarver et al
as 3:2013cv00094
Plaintiff:
Durwin L. Abbott
Defendant:
Bruce Coston, James M. Leblanc, Steve Rader and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loeber v. Rader et al
as 3:2013cv00083
Respondent:
James D. Caldwell, Jr. and Steve Rader
Petitioner:
Stephen C. Loeber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Rader et al
as 2:2013cv00196
Plaintiff:
Majuangy Evans
Defendant:
Steve Rader
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
