Cases 31 - 40 of 285
Buelna et al v. Dannels et al
as 4:2021cv00216
Plaintiff:
Lorenia Buelna, Unknown Parties and Sara Babuca Lucero
Defendant:
Mark Brnovich, Cochise County Board of Supervisors, Tony Estrada and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Peppers et al v. Mascher et al
as 3:2021cv08090
Defendant:
Unknown Hearl, Wexford Medical Services, Yavapai County Board of Directors and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tinsley and Gordon Peppers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miller v. Penzone et al
as 2:2021cv00444
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, E Wick, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron W Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Penzone et al
as 2:2021cv00315
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Jessie Spurgin, Unknown Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Benny Charles Brooks, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shadid v. Penzone et al
as 2:2021cv00067
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Unknown Parties, Unknown Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Alfred Philip Shadid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez-Flores v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2020cv00564
Defendant:
David Jendusa, Pima County Adult Detention, Arizona, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Lopez-Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knudsen v. Penzone et al
as 2:2020cv02440
Plaintiff:
Brett Aaron Knudsen
Defendant:
Paul Penzone and Maricopa County Board of Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Penzone et al
as 2:2020cv02366
Defendant:
Paul Penzone and Maricopa County Executive Board of Supervisors
Plaintiff:
Kedrick D Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. Penzone et al
as 2:2020cv02371
Plaintiff:
William Hinton
Defendant:
Paul Penzone and Maricopa County Executive Board of Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantua v. Penzone et al
as 2:2020cv02367
Defendant:
Paul Penzone and Maricopa County Executive Board of Supervisors
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cantua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
