Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Fields v. Harris County Medical Department et al
as 4:2016cv01722
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Fields
Defendant:
Harris County Medical Department, Texas Medical Branch and T.D.C.J. ID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. State of Texas T.D.C.J. Parole Division et al
as 1:2015cv00999
Defendant:
Adelaida Almazan, Patricia Fleming, Stuart Jenkins and others
Plaintiff:
David John Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Emmett v. T.D.C.J. Corporation
as 4:2015cv02658
Plaintiff:
Barry Emmett
Defendant:
T.D.C.J. Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendiola v. Cameron County DA Officer et al
as 7:2015mc01523
Plaintiff:
Melquidades Mendiola, Jr.
Defendant:
Cameron County DA Officer, FBI, T.D.C.J. and others
Davis v. Bales et al
as 6:2015cv00262
Defendant:
Ralph Bales, Director Brad Livingston, T.D.C.J. - Medical Department and others
Plaintiff:
James Wayne Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. United States Congress et al
as 4:2015cv02525
Plaintiff:
Ellery Oliver
Defendant:
United States Congress, United States District Court (Southern Dist.), Texas Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. A.M. Stringfellow Unit, et al.
as 5:2015cv00694
Defendant:
A.M. Stringfellow Unit, et al., FNU Freeman, Elvis Allen Hightower and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drones v. T.D.C.J.
as 1:2015cv00166
Petitioner:
Jesse Lee Drones
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
T.D.C.J.
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1324 Aliens: Complaint for Forfeiture
Drones v. T.D.C.J. et al
as 1:2015cv00167
Defendant:
Sgt. R. Cardona, Counseler Substitutes, Disciplinary Office Captain and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Drones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Tasby v. T.D.C.J.
as 4:2014cv00659
Plaintiff:
L.T. Tasby
Defendant:
T.D.C.J.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
