Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 31 - 40 of 166
MAUL v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2020cv00439
Plaintiff: E'NGAI MAUL
Defendant: WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC, STEPHANIE SEERING, DANIEL LUNDE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KANABLE v. COBLE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00412
Defendant: CONKRIN, PAUL A. TALBOT, WION and others
Plaintiff: KRISTOPHER KANABLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smallwood v. Williams et al
as 3:2020cv00101
Defendant: Daugherty, Hammond, Conlon and others
Plaintiff: Howard Smallwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHUCK v. TALBOT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00322
Defendant: WEXFORD HEALTH CARE SERVICES INC. and PAUL TALBOT
Plaintiff: NOEL SHUCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KINARTAIL v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2020cv00324
Defendant: WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC, P. TALBOT and UBAIDULLAH SHARIEF
Plaintiff: R. KINARTAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARTLOW v. BROWN et al
as 1:2020cv00177
Defendant: DUSHAN ZATECKY, RICHARD BROWN, TALBOT and others
Plaintiff: EDWARD M. PARTLOW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOK v. TALBOT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00049
Defendant: CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, PAUL TALBOT and WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES
Plaintiff: E. COOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2019cv05043
Defendant: WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC, P. TALBOT and K. PRYOR
Plaintiff: MICHAEL SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWMAN v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv04603
Defendant: CHRISTINA CONYERS, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC., JESSICA JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff: TIMMY BOWMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLE v. TALBOT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv04601
Plaintiff: THOMAS COLE
Defendant: PAUL TALBOT and WEXFORD HEALTH CARE SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?