Cases 31 - 38 of 38
John Smentek, et al v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 11-3261
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN SMENTEK, MALCOLM PATTON, MELVIN PHILLIPS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County and COOK COUNTY
Thomas Dart, et al v. John Smentek, et al
as 11-8022
Petitioner:
THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County and COOK COUNTY
Respondent:
JOHN SMENTEK, MALCOLM PATTON, MELVIN PHILLIPS and others
Shaun Brame v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 10-3831
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAUN BRAME
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County, Illinois and CCDOC, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Executive Director of Cook County Jail, CHESTER PLAXICO, Superintendent of Division (10) Cook County Illinois, CCDOC Star #114 and others
Anthony Williams v. Roger Mulch, et al
as 10-1814
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER D. MULCH, Sheriff of Jefferson County, RANDY POLLARD, CPT Jefferson County Jail, DENNIS DOE, 1 through 100 each an individual and others
Abraham Yasin v. Thomas Dart
as 09-4015
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ABRAHAM A. YASIN
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County
SKS & Associates, Incorporated v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 09-3461
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SKS & ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County and E. KENNETH WRIGHT, as Presiding Judge First Municipal District
Derrick Canady v. Derrick Davis, et al
as 09-2391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK CANADY
Defendant - Appellee:
DERRICK DAVIS, Correctional officer, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS and THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County
Emerson Tucker v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 09-2233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMERSON TUCKER
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, an Illinois Municipal Corporation, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Executive Director of Cook County Department of Corrections and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
