Cases 31 - 40 of 84
SMITH v. WARDEN ALLEGHENY JAIL
as 2:2016cv01490
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH
Defendant:
WARDEN ALLEGHENY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. CHIEF DIRECTOR SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2016cv01486
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
CHIEF DIRECTOR SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA CHIEF DIRECTOR, PENNSYLVANIA CHIEF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. HIGHMARK
as 2:2016cv01364
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
HIGHMARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. CHIEF POAST MASTER GENERAL
as 2:2016cv01365
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
CHIEF POAST MASTER GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. RASE'S SHOP 'N SAVE OWNERS
as 2:2016cv01366
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
RASE'S SHOP 'N SAVE OWNERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. CHIEF SEACAITORY OF THE ARMY
as 2:2016cv01325
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
CHIEF SEACAITORY OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SMITH v. BAN O RAIL ROADS CORPRACTIONS OWNERS et al
as 2:2016cv01327
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
BAN O RAIL ROADS CORPRACTIONS OWNERS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRACTION and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. U.S.S. STEEL CORPRACTION OWNER"S
as 2:2016cv01323
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
U.S.S. STEEL CORPRACTION OWNER"S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL
as 2:2016cv01324
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. DEFENTS AN OWNERS WALMART CORPRACTIO OF PENNSYLVNIA et al
as 2:2016cv01328
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
DEFENTS AN OWNERS WALMART CORPRACTIO OF PENNSYLVNIA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
