Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Nelson v. Buerau of Land Management et al
as 1:2009cv00004
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Nelson
Defendant:
Buerau of Land Management, Michael Thompson and Mike Kastorian
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Steffensen v. City of Fairbanks et al
as 4:2009cv00004
Plaintiff:
Frank Steffensen
Defendant:
City of Fairbanks, Ron Dupree, Avery Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 1:2008cv00017
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Nelson
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management, Michael Thompson and Mike Kastorian
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Great Divide Insurance Company v. Monahan et al
as 3:2008cv00118
Plaintiff:
Great Divide Insurance Company
Defendant:
John Monahan, Piutr Matha, Carlos Aburto and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
I.M. et al v. Alaska Department of Education and Early Development et al
as 3:2008cv00108
Plaintiff:
I.M., Mary M. and Mark M.
Defendant:
Alaska Department of Education and Early Development, Larry Ledoux and Barbara Thompson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sherer et al v. Williams et al
as 1:2008cv00005
Plaintiff:
Donald Sherer, Michelle Sherer and Jared Sherer
Defendant:
Dwight Williams, Blake Ostler, Thacker & Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Thompson v. Luna, et al.
as 3:2008cv00013
Defendant:
Carl Thompson, Frank Luna, Frank Luna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Luna et al
as 3:2007cv00251
Plaintiff:
Carl Thompson
Defendant:
Frank Luna, Bonita French, Health Services Administrator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Helen M. Smith v. John W. Sedwick, et al
as 3:2007cv00025
Plaintiff:
Helen M. Smith
Defendant:
John W. Sedwick, Ralph R. Beistline, Timothy M. Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
