Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Perkins v. Thaler
as 6:2013cv00077
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Troy Lee Perkins
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Troy Perkins v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 13-50072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TROY LEE PERKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BRAD LIVINGSTON, DIRECTOR UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH REBECCA RUSSO, STEVEN WARE and others
Perkins v. Director TDCJ
as 9:2013cv00011
Petitioner:
Troy Lee Perkins
Respondent:
Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perkins v. Livingston et al
as 6:2013cv00004
Defendant:
William Hull, Exec. Director Brad Livingston, Director UTMB Rebecca Russo and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Lee Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troy Perkins v. Andy Chatham, et al
as 12-11203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TROY LEE PERKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE ANDY CHATHAM, 282nd District Court of Dallas County, Texas, DALLAS COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, CRAIG WATKINS, Dallas County District Attorneys Office and others
Troy Perkins v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 12-41094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TROY LEE PERKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, TIMOTHY C SIMMONS, V. MILLER and others
Perkins v. Chatham et al
as 3:2012cv03651
Plaintiff:
Troy Lee Perkins
Defendant:
Andy Chatham, Dallas Co. Public Defenders Office, Craig Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Chatham et al
as 6:2012cv00219
Defendant:
Chief of Police David Brown, Judge Andy Chatham, Dallas Co. Public Defenders Office and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Lee Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Livingston et al
as 9:2012cv00121
Plaintiff:
Troy Lee Perkins
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Timothy C Simmons, V Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
