Cases 31 - 40 of 1,107
Henderson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Terry Henderson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Conroy v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Terry Conroy
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mitchell et al. v. Taylor et al.
as 3:2023cv02266
Plaintiff:
Terry Mitchell and TDM Logistics
Defendant:
David Taylor and Cassens Transport Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Banks v. Reid et al.
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Banks, III
Defendant:
Theresa Reid, Jordan Close, Terry Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Healy
as 5:2024cv00011
Petitioner:
Terry Clark
Respondent:
Warden Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pyer v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03814
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Pyer
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Carr v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv02923
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Terri Melissa Carr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jernigan et al v. Bard Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03386
Plaintiff:
Kathy Jernigan and Terry Jernigan
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marioth v. Palumbo et al
as 2:2023cv03710
Plaintiff:
Terry Marioth, Jr.
Defendant:
Jon Palumbo, Mariah Alford, Griffin Bluestone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
