Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Johns v. McKune, et al
as 13-3289
Petitioner - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JOHNS
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility, STATE OF KANSAS and DEREK SCHMIDT, Attorney General of the State of Kansas
Tinner v. Tenth Judicial District of KS., et al
as 13-3284
Petitioner - Appellant:
FABIAN TINNER
Respondent - Appellee:
TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF KANSAS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF KANSAS
Cheatham v. Cline, et al
as 13-3138
Petitioner - Appellant:
PHILLIP CHEATHAM, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
SAM CLINE, Warden and DEREK SCHMIDT, Attorney General of the State of Kansas
In re: Cheatham, Jr.
as 13-3135
Petitioner:
PHILLIP CHEATHAM, JR.
Respondent:
SAM CLINE, Warden and DEREK SCHMIDT, Attorney General of the State of Kansas
Pruitt v. Shelton, et al
as 13-3012
Petitioner - Appellant:
JUSTIN PRUITT
Respondent - Appellee:
JAY SHELTON, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF KANSAS
Van Ross v. Shelton, et al
as 12-3336
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN CRAIG VAN ROSS
Respondent - Appellee:
J.L. SHELTON and DEREK SCHMIDT, Attorney General of the State of Kansas
Evans v. McKune, et al
as 12-3313
Petitioner - Appellant:
DELARICK EVANS
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID R. MCKUNE, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF KANSAS and APPELLATE COURTS OF KANSAS
Thompson v. McKune, et al
as 12-3239
Petitioner - Appellant:
DENNIS W. THOMPSON
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID MCKUNE, Warden, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility and STEPHEN N. SIX, Attorney General of the State of Kansas
Gleason v. McKune, et al
as 12-3212
Petitioner - Appellant:
NOAH J. GLEASON
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID R. MCKUNE and DEREK SCHMIDT, Attorney General of the State of Kansas
Brinkman # 133444 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2012cv00290
Petitioner:
Albert L Brinkman
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
