Cases 31 - 40 of 4,876
FRYE v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00322
Petitioner:
TARANCE FRYE
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FRYE v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00642
Petitioner:
TARANCE FRYE
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HYMAN v. WARDEN OF SCI HOUTZDALE et al
as 3:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
JAVON HYMAN
Respondent:
WARDEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. BOOHER et al
as 2:2024cv00309
Petitioner:
JEROME JOHNSON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT BOOHER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DANIELS v. IRWIN et al
as 2:2024cv00859
Petitioner:
RAYMOND A. DANIELS
Respondent:
RANDY IRWIN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALEXANDER v. HOUSER et al
as 2:2024cv00391
Petitioner:
TYRONE ALEXANDER and TYRONE S. ALEXANDER
Respondent:
MARTIN HOUSER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRASWELL v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2024cv00279
Petitioner:
XAVIER BRASWELL
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, SCI ALBION, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBINSON v. WAHL et al
as 2:2024cv00963
Petitioner:
FARUQ ROBINSON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MARK WAHL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RICKER v. SCI PINE GROVE et al
as 2:2024cv00273
Petitioner:
DAVID EDWARD RICKER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDANT SCI PINE GROVE, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, SUPERINTENDENT SCI PINE GROVE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OWENS v. RIVELLO et al
as 2:2024cv00232
Petitioner:
LEON OWENS
Respondent:
JOHN RIVELLO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
