Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Dresen v. California Army National Guard, et al
as 2:2014cv01814
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Dresen
Defendant:
California Army National Guard and Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552
American Small Business League v. United States Department of the Army
as 3:2014cv02168
Plaintiff:
American Small Business League
Defendant:
United States Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Gilbert Betancourt v. Department of the Army et al
as 2:2014cv02466
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Betancourt
Defendant:
Carl W.S. Chun, Department of the Army and Does
Avery v. Department of the Army
as 5:2014cv01077
Plaintiff:
Robert Derwin Avery
Defendant:
Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newdow v. United States of America et al
as 2:2013cv02012
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Newdow
Defendant:
United States of America, US Department of Health and Human Services and United States Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Munger Tolles & Olson LLP v. United States Department of the Army
as 2:2013cv06890
Plaintiff:
Munger Tolles & Olson LLP
Defendant:
United States Department of the Army
Contreras v. California National Guard et al
as 2:2013cv01440
Plaintiff:
Graciela M Contreras
Defendant:
California National Guard, United States Department of the Army and John McHugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
American Small Business League v. United States Department of the Army
as 3:2013cv02736
Plaintiff:
American Small Business League
Defendant:
United States Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Wilson v. Department of the Army
as 3:2013cv00643
Petitioner:
Helda Wilson
Respondent:
Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv05014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
