Cases 31 - 40 of 16,928
Ramirez v. Val
as 3:2024cv03190
Plaintiff:
Elias Torres Ramirez
Defendant:
Val
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Torres v. Tate et al
as 3:2024cv01019
Plaintiff:
Arturo Torres
Defendant:
Levencia Tate and Noah Beltramea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Mosley et al v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 3:2024cv03173
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Mosley, Amy Caster, Amy Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Simpson v. Ohana Military Communities, LLC
as 1:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Bryan Simpson, Christgon Simpson, Klearance Simpson and others
Defendant:
Ohana Military Communities, LLC, Hunt MH Property Management, LLC and Doe Defendants 1-10
Cross Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Negron v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06205
Plaintiff:
Emijacsiul Torres Negron
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Salazar Torres et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2024cv00908
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Salazar Torres and Maria C Arredondo
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1441 FHLB: Financial Inst Reform Receiving Enforcement Act 1989
Ramirez v. James
as 3:2024cv03064
Plaintiff:
Elias Torres Ramirez
Defendant:
James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
