Cases 31 - 40 of 154
Gallego-Soto v. Trinity Services Group et al
as 2:2022cv01554
Plaintiff:
Luis Manuel Gallego-Soto
Defendant:
Trinity Services Group, Unknown Party, Fred Figuerroa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gallego-Soto v. CCA Core Civic et al
as 2:2022cv01555
Plaintiff:
Luis Manuel Gallego-Soto
Defendant:
CCA Core Civic, Fred Figuerroa, Melissa Laupenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wise v. Grady et al
as 4:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
William Wise
Defendant:
Jacob John Grady, Unknown Grady, Luis A Leal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00456
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
