Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Martinez v. Union Pacific Railroad
as 2:2010cv05083
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Martinez
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Cadenas v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2010cv05089
Plaintiff:
Jerry Cadenas
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Moore v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2009cv01082
Plaintiff:
Marc A Moore
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. River Front Properties LLC
as 2:2009cv00226
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant:
River Front Properties LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv05732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mears v. Union Pacific Railroad
as 2:2008cv01666
Plaintiff:
Jack Mears and Jack Mears
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kavanagh v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2008cv05066
Plaintiff:
Gregory C Kavanagh
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chambers v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2008cv00287
Plaintiff:
Richard Chambers
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Farmer v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2008cv05046
Plaintiff:
William C Farmer
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Olmstead v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2008cv00215
Plaintiff:
Larry Olmstead, Larry Olmstead and Larry Olmstead
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
