Cases 31 - 40 of 199
Poling v. Cumberland County Detention Center
as 5:2023ct03186
Petitioner:
Zachary Nathaniel Poling
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant and Cumberland County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Charlie Egbert Cain, Brad Donahue, Taimon Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCormick v. Unnamed Respondent
as 5:2023hc02131
Petitioner:
Markus Odon McCormick
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stout v. Sgt. Hood, et al
as 5:2023ct03167
Plaintiff:
James Stout and James Wayne Stout
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant, Sgt Hood and Officer Lechner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oumous v. Unnamed Defendants
as 5:2023ct03152
Plaintiff:
Noureddine Oumous
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Locklear
as 5:2023ct03149
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Duncan
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant and Steven Earl Locklear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noonsab v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2023ct03122
Plaintiff:
Somchai Noonsab
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Pridgen v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2023ct03121
Plaintiff:
Richard Pridgen
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2023ct03120
Plaintiff:
James E. Anderson
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shew v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2023ct03106
Plaintiff:
Trenton Shew
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littlejohn v. Bullard
as 5:2023ct03104
Plaintiff:
Allen Littlejohn
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant, Jamie Bullard, Mark Barnhill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
