Cases 31 - 40 of 225
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hines v. Skull and Bones Association et al
as 3:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines
Defendant:
Skull and Bones Association, Bridgeport Hospital, Yale New Haven Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hines et al v. Yale New Haven Hospital et al
as 3:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Marqice Hines and Shemeka Hines
Defendant:
Yale New Haven Hospital, Bridgeport Hospital, Skull and Bones Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Arthur v. Mejia et al
as 3:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Kemecia Arthur
Defendant:
Jose Mejia, St. Vincent Medical Center and Conn. Legislative Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
St. Vincent's Multispecialty Group, Inc. v. CPI/AHP Cross Street Mob Owner, L.L.C.
as 3:2021cv01705
Counter Defendant:
St. Vincent's Multispecialty Group, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
CPI/AHP Cross Street Mob Owner, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Ansanelli
as 3:2021cv01542
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Vincent W. Ansanelli, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Watson v. American Security Insurance Company
as 3:2021cv01518
Plaintiff:
Vincent Watson
Defendant:
American Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Boyd v. Walker et al
as 3:2021cv01252
Plaintiff:
Ray Victor Boyd and I-Noble Ra
Defendant:
D. Walker, Cruz, Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaPenna v. Ioveno et al
as 3:2021cv01120
Plaintiff:
Eric Vincent LaPenna
Defendant:
Ioveno and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
