Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Brown v. VRM et al
as 6:2013cv00275
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Brown
Defendant:
VRM and Wells Fargo, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Smith et al v. Citi Mortgage et al
as 1:2013cv02537
Plaintiff:
Reginald D. Smith and Michelle Jones
Defendant:
Citi Mortgage , Pendergast & Associates, P.C. , McCalla Raymer LLC and others
Courcy v. VRM (Vendor Resource Management), et al
as 4:2013cv00394
Plaintiff:
Mara Courcy
Defendant:
VRM (Vendor Resource Management) and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
VRM v. Winters
as 3:2013cv01930
Plaintiff:
VRM
Defendant:
Donnie Winters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Levi et al v. Citimortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00382
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc., Jack O'Boyle & Associates, John James "Jack" O'Boyle, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Laticia Levi and Gerald Singleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
VRM (Vendor Resource Management) v. Brown
as 1:2013cv00932
Plaintiff:
VRM (Vendor Resource Management)
Defendant:
Earl Brown
VRM (Vendor Resource Management) vs. Chandler Taylor, et al
as 5:2013cv00086
Defendant:
All Occupants of 10847 Cougar Chase, San Antonio, Texas 78251 and Chandler Taylor
Plaintiff:
VRM (Vendor Resource Management)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
VRM v. McGillivray et al
as 1:2013cv00013
Defendant:
All Occupants of 202 Settlers Valley Drive Pflugerville, Texas 78660 and Mark McGillivray
Plaintiff:
VRM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Briggs v. VRM Group aka Vision Receivable Management Group, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00787
Plaintiff:
Roslynn Briggs
Defendant:
VRM Group aka Vision Receivable Management Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2009cv10096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
