Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Vickers v. GA Regional Atlanta
as 1:2017cv01400
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Vickers
Respondent:
GA Regional Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vickers v. Unnamed Respondent
as 1:2017cv01190
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Vickers
Defendant:
Patricia Handy, Cobb County Adult Detention Center, GA Regional Atlanta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vickers v. Raissi et al
as 1:2017cv00676
Defendant:
Raissi, David Raissi, Brian Kemp and others
Plaintiff:
Vickers and Jeffrey Scott Vickers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Vickers v. Oasis Management System et al
as 1:2016cv04620
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Vickers
Defendant:
Oasis Management System, State of Georgia, Central State Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vickers v. Vickers et al
as 5:2016cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Vickers
Defendant:
Melvin Gene Vickers, Janice Marie Vickers, Mary Ann Vickers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Corbitt et al v. Coffee County, Georgia et al
as 5:2016cv00051
Plaintiff:
Amy Corbitt , Jerry Rich , Elizabeth Bowen and others
Defendant:
Coffee County, Georgia, George Wooten and Michael Vickers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vickers v. Waste USA, Inc.
as 1:2016cv01990
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Vickers
Defendant:
Waste USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Denison v. Dumich et al
as 2:2016cv00108
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Denison
Defendant:
Nicholas G. Dumich, Avita Community Partners, Stephen Mitchell Sugg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vickers v. Dong et al
as 1:2016cv00026
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Vickers
Defendant:
Craig E. Dong, West Cobb Diner, Publix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
