Cases 31 - 40 of 80
Zirkle Fruit Company v. United States Department of Labor et al
as 1:2019cv03180
Defendant:
Patrick Pizzella, Cheryl M Stanton, John P Pallasch and others
Plaintiff:
Zirkle Fruit Company
Intervenor Plaintiff:
WGE Holdings LLC, McDougall & Sons Inc, Columbia Orchard Management Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Adamsky et al v. Amazon.com Inc et al
as 2:2019cv01214
Plaintiff:
Lyndi Reichenbach, Allison Winske, Christina Gardner and others
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., A2Z Development Center Inc and Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510
Petty v. Lincoln County et al
as 2:2019cv00237
Defendant:
Lucas Mallon, Wade W Magers, Lincoln County and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Clayton Petty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2019cv01009
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Michael Wade Adams
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dickerson v. City of Port Angeles et al
as 3:2018cv05072
Plaintiff:
Wade Ray Dickerson
Defendant:
City of Port Angeles and Lucas Degand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Linderman v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv05934
Plaintiff:
Garret Wade Linderman
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sanford v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv05820
Plaintiff:
Wade Lewis Sanford
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Carrillo et al
as 2:2017mc00121
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Luis J Carrillo, Wade D Huettel, Carrillo Huettel LLP and others
Pierce et al v. American Reliable Insurance Company
as 2:2017cv01173
Plaintiff:
Wade Pierce and Matt McGuane
Defendant:
American Reliable Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Adams v. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv01019
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Michael Wade Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
